Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Valley Flyer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Paoli/Thorndale Line. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:40, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Great Valley Flyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable commuter train. Just because it's a super-express and has a name doesn't mean it deserves an article. Train2104 (talk) 17:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to SEPTA Regional Rail or R5 (SEPTA) - Usually I would be in favor of keeping named trains, but in this case the train is basically the R5 (SEPTA), but simply stops less. This information can easily be included in a parent article, similar to how Baby Bullet redirects to Caltrain.--Oakshade (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to appropriate target noted above. Freakshownerd (talk) 01:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to R5 (SEPTA); this is basically a different service on the same line, which doesn't merit its own article without significant coverage. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 01:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Remember that the line is now called the Paoli/Thorndale Line and any merger should be done to that title when it is expanded (currently a redirect). Train2104 (talk) 14:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Paoli/Thorndale Line, per Oakshade and TheCatalyst31, and add it as a chapter of the article. ----DanTD (talk) 21:07, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Paoli/Thorndale Line. Dough4872 01:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.